Gimp vs Photoshop

10 09 2008

I’m no graphics professional, but like probably most of you, I do need to edit photos from time to time. I used Adobe Photoshop before since it is the most widely used image manipulating software. But when I started using Linux, things changed.

Since GIMP (GNU Image Manipulation Program) is included by default in most Linux distros, I had no other choice but to try it. I then became more and more comfortable using it that I completely forgot about Photoshop. I know that I can still install Photoshop in Linux through software virtualization, but no thanks.

Here are my reasons why I made the switch and why I think GIMP is better than Photoshop:

1. GIMP has a simple and easy to use Graphical User Interface compared to a more cluttered working environment in Photoshop.

2. GIMP has a way lighter footprint than Photoshop. You don’t need plenty of disk space to install GIMP. The size of Gimp’s installer is less than 20MB; Photoshop could be around 600MB.

3. GIMP is wicked fast. The minimum recommended RAM requirement to run GIMP is only 128MB. The latest version of Photoshop will probably need 512MB at minimum.

4. GIMP has the right amount of essential features that I need. I think Photoshop is way too bloated and some of its included features are unnecessary.

5. GIMP can read and write most Photoshop native PSD format files, but Photoshop does not support GIMP’s native XCF file format.

6. GIMP has a more powerful automation than Photoshop.

7. GIMP’s open development model means that it is much more readily available on more operating systems, plugin development is not limited by developers and as such has no need to compete with Photoshop; by comparison, access to Adobe Photoshop’s SDK requires authorization.

8. GIMP is available at no cost compared to Photoshop’s hefty price tag.

How about you? Do you also feel that GIMP is better than Adobe Photoshop?

Fonte | Linux & Open Source Blog

Annunci




Se volete la soluzione..

16 10 2007

Da attivissimo.blogspot.com

“Urban Legends, il programma antibufala che ha debuttato ieri sera su Italia 1, è una versione riconfezionata di una serie del 2002, intitolata “Mostly True Stories: Urban Legends Revealed”. Il dubbio che non fosse un’autoproduzione Mediaset m’è venuto notando che le ricostruzioni delle leggende usavano spesso un contesto poco italiano (le forme delle case, le prese elettriche stravaganti e tipicamente britanniche, per esempio).

Niente di male, per carità: ma questo riconfezionamento mi permette di darvi una dritta che vi consentirà di fare bella figura con gli amici “indovinando” tutti i quiz del programma, che chiede agli spettatori di decidere quali delle storie raccontate sono vere e quali sono bufale.

L’elenco completo delle storie è infatti disponibile qui. E’ in inglese, lo so, ma far bella figura deve costare un po’ di fatica, no? “








%d blogger hanno fatto clic su Mi Piace per questo: